Impacts on Biostation? George Reserve? Saginaw Woods? I'm not sure, and would hope not. I operate under the assumption that UMBS & other UM holdings are owned by the Regents, not the state. We need a legal opinion or clarification, however.
Aside from the Biostation, this has the potential for serious negative impacts on various types of "protected areas". It seems like very bad policy. I have forwarded this to some colleagues at MI TNC, and ELPC (www.elpc.org) as well.
Short notice. What can/should we do?
Suggestions welcome.
From Knute Nadelhoffer
-----------------
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B0cJvp4zsDTKNjJqLVZnRG5QZkU/edit?usp=sharing
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B0cJvp4zsDTKLUd0MmF5cGlGajQ/edit?usp=sharing
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B0cJvp4zsDTKLUd0MmF5cGlGajQ/edit?usp=sharing
NOTICE OF SCHEDULED MEETING
**PLEASE NOTE TIME**
COMMITTEE: Natural Resources, Environment and Great Lakes
DATE: Thursday, February 7, 2013
TIME: 9:00 AM
PLACE: Room 210, Farnum Building, 125 W. Allegan Street,
Lansing, MI 48933
PHONE: Lauren Michalak (373-5323)
Committee Clerk
AGENDA
SB 78 Sen. Casperson Natural resources; wildlife; designation of
biodiversity areas; prohibit by DNR and remove biological diversity from
list of state forest management goals.
And any other business properly before the committee.
